Hypocephalus of Shishaq (Sheshonq)
שִׁישַׁק
The above facsimile represents Michael Lyon’s masterful reconstruction of
the Shishaq Hypocephalus. See M. Lyon, “Appreciating Hypocephali as Works of Art and Faith”, FARMS Book of Abraham Lecture
Series, 1999. Numbers, corresponding to Book of Abraham Facsimile 2, have been
inserted, and Figure 7 has been adjusted (slightly) to more authentically
represent the Egyptian depiction. See other Hypocephali (below). As an
artist and careful researcher, M. Lyon may have been a little conflicted: Should he be
true to the Egyptian, or to the “Mormon” representation? There happens to be
an ancient point of view that reconciles both.
ADAPTED EXPLANATION
Fig. 1.
Kolob
כּלב
(after, like, as the heart, as the mind)
or
כּוֹל-לב (all heart,
whole heart),
signifying the first creation, nearest to the celestial, or
the residence of God; which residence the
Ah-meh-strah-ans called
E-Beth-Ka.
First in government, the last pertaining to the measurement of time.
The measurement according to celestial time, which celestial time
signifies one day to an
amah
אַמָה.
(One Day To A Cubit) One day in Kolob is equal to
a thousand years
according to the measurement of this earth, which is called by the Ah-meh-strah-ans
[, sacred
Tetragrammaton like name of the Earth],
Oan or Ah-e being
the temporal world after
Zub-zool-eh
(the earth as it was in the beginning); the
whole earth in her paradisiacal glory being
Beth-ku-ain-trieth
[see Note א].
(Tehilah (Ps.) 84:10)
Note: “Kolob
in the second degree. It signfies the wonder of Abraham the
eldest of all the stars, the
greatest body of the heavenly bodies that ever was discovered by man”
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan
Language 2nd Part, 2nd Degree, “Kolob”,
pg. 32.)
“Kolob in the first degree, It signifies the first great grand governing
fixed Star which is the
fartherest that ever has been discovered by the fathers which was discovered by Methuselar and also by Abraham”
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan
Language, 2nd Part, 1st Degree, “Kolob”,
pg. 34.)
The constellation of the seated queen Cassiopeia appears near, and points directly to the
Andromeda Galaxy (M31). The shining nucleus or bulge of the spiral galaxy is
in fact, the oldest,
largest, and
most distant
object in the night sky that ancient humans could have beheld naturally.
Not constrained
by a modern
astrophysical definition of what constitutes a “star”, ancient Hebrews would have likely referred to the
shining nucleus or bulge of M31 as
“kokab be-anan”
כּוֹכָב בֶּעָנָן,
“star in a cloud”.
(Abraham 3:13,
16)
This fits the description in Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-ans
Language, 2nd Part, 5th Degree, “Flos isis”,
pg. 25. See also Tehilim (Ps.) 97:2.
What ancients saw as a kokab in a cloud (the shining
heart of M31) was actually a great cosmic creation composed of many stars. This creation is appropriately portrayed symbolically as the many headed, multifaceted
Egyptian deity at the heart of the hypocephalus.
See also the hypocephali below in Note ד. Moreover, the ancients
likely beheld in the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) a “kokab ka-leb be-anan”,
a “star as the heart in a cloud” - the shining heart of a distant heavenly temple, a
far off celestial Holy of Holies. To reveal the veiled Kolob
at the heart of our own galaxy (the Milky Way), would require
a means of disclosing invisible infrared and x-ray “light”
passing the nebular curtains of the Milky Way. It would require an
Urim v'Tumim. (Abraham 3:1-2,
Tehilah (Ps.) 139:12)
See Note ה.
Note: In the Shishaq Hypocephalus, the ratio of the length of the rectangle containing Figures 1, 22 and
23, to its height, is roughly the ratio of the length of the Ark of the Covenant (Aron ha-Brit) to its height, or breadth. This ratio is close to
φ, the
Golden ratio. In the case of
the frame surrounding Figures 1, 22 and 23, the approximation of φ is good to at least the rational
Fibonacci approximation 3/2 = 1.5.
Fig. 2.
Stands next to Kolob, called by the Ah-meh-strah-ans [see Note
ב]
Oliblish
אל לב ליש,
which is the next grand governing creation near to the celestial or the place
where God resides; holding the key of power also, pertaining to other
mazalot
מַזָלוׂת; as revealed from God to Avram, as he offered sacrifice upon an
altar, which he had built unto
the
Eternal.
Note: The term “planet”
comes from the Greek meaning “wanderer” i.e. “wandering stars”, “asteres planetai”.
(Jude 1:13)
This is not a word that Abram would have used. The expression “fixed planets”
(Facsimile 2,
Figure 5) appears to be something of an oxymormon,
since planets by definition are “wanderers”. The Semitic term “mazalot”, meaning “stars of fortune or fate - lucky stars,
abodes of gods” is translated “planets” (KJV), but the word may also
refer to “stars” or groups of stars that appear to move together, and appear relatively “fixed” with respect to
each other.
(LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:42-43)
Scripture combined with the
Kirtland Egyptian Papers indicates that dual Oliblish [see Note ד]
is both a
planet (divine abode,
like
missel,
Na mesile possibly meaning “mazal”
מַזָל) and a
central
fixed star. The pair of Oliblish-im are likely massive multi-stellar
creations tied to celestial objects with crushing gravity - able to interface with,
stir, knead, and roll the
great starry arms of the galaxy.
Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-ans
Language, 2nd Part, 5th Degree, ,
pg. 24, 2nd Part, 2nd Degree, ,
pg. 31.
In light of Kolob being the great central galactic nucleus or
bulge surrounded by a halo of unseen matter, Oliblish-im
(which are double, see Note ד), are positioned griffin or keruvim
like at the bicameral ends with Kolob in between. The Oliblish-im both orbit central Kolob
(planet like) and are in the general fixed direction of the veiled galactic
center in the direction of the “mazal”
of Sagittarius. (Iyov (Job) 12:22)
See Note ה.
The characters to the left of the standing two-headed god read: “The name
of this Mighty God”. (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 4-5)
Fig. 3.
This figure was appropriately copied from a Book of the Dead in
Joseph Smith’s possession, and inserted in place of the lacuna
(missing portion - upper right hand) of the Shishaq Hypocephalus. Compare with other hypocephali (below).
Figure 3 Is made
to represent God, sitting upon his throne, clothed with power and authority;
with a crown of eternal light upon his head; representing also the grand
Key-words of the Holy Priesthood, as revealed to ha-Adam in the Garden of
Eden, as also to Shet, Noah,
Malki-tsedeq, Avraham, and all to
whom the Priesthood was revealed.
Note: One of the sublime lessons of the hypocephalus is that there is more than one
abode and throne of God, and none of them are
absolutely fixed in space. Being near Kolob does not mean centered or
stationed at absolute rest. Absolute space fails to exist in an infinite universe. (Devarim (Deut.) 33:26,
YehezqEl (Ezek.) 1:26),
2nd Part,
3rd Degree, “E beth Ka”,
pg. 29.
The celestial kingdom of God E-Beth-Ka could be an orbiting throne system of celestial worlds. Near Kolob there could be celestial throne systems both inside and outside the great central
“Kokob“ or galactic Holy of Holies.
See Note ה.
The characters to the left of the
falcon-headed sun god seated on his papyrus barge, read: “Divine ship”. (Michael D.
Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp.
4,6)
Appropriately inserted
immediately to the left of the papyrus solar ferry
(Heb. “avarat-ham”
עברת־חם), near Figure 2 in
the Church published version, is a little
libation stand holding the papyrus and lotus bouquet .
This symbol is interpreted to represent “Abraham in Egypt”.
See
Figure 10 and
3 of Facsimiles 1 and 3 respectively (adapted from the Hor Book of
Breathings). Now look near the LDS addition
Figure
2 (Facsimile 2). Note that the papyrus-lotus bouquet symbol does not appear
in the original Shishaq Hypocephalus - nor does it appear near the
two-headed god in other hypocephali (below). The introduction of the “Abraham in Egypt” papyrus -
lotus bouquet, and adjacent “avarat-ham”
solar ship (Figure 3)
serves to “Abramize” the pagan hypocephalus in ways the Ah-meh-strah-an
could relate to.
Fig. 4.
Answers to the Hebrew word
Raqiya
רָקִיע,
signifying expanse, or the firmament of the heavens [see Note
ג]; also a numerical
figure, in Ah-meh-strah-an signifying one thousand; answering to the
measuring of the time of Oliblish, which is equal with Kolob in its
revolution and in its measuring of time.
See
Ahmehstrahan Counting and Gematria
Fig. 5.
Is called in Ah-meh-strah-an Enish-go-on-dosh; this is one of the
governing mazalot also, and is said by the Ah-meh-strah-ans to be the Sun,
and to borrow its light from Kolob through the medium of Kae-e-vanrash,
which is the grand Key, or, in other words, the governing power, which
governs fifteen other fixed mazalot or
kokhavim
כּוׂכָבִים, as also Floeese or the Moon,
the Earth and the Sun in their annual revolutions.
This
mazalah receives its power through the
medium of Kli-flos-is-es, or Ha-kokhavim, the kokhavim represented by numbers 22 and 23, receiving
light from the revolutions of Kolob.
Spelled with the letter “Qoph”
as in the Hebrew word “qophim”,
meaning “apes,
monkeys” (22 and 23),“Qol-leb” in this case,
means “Voice of the heart”. Compare “Qoph” with
Ah-meh-strah-ans
symbol for “Flo-ees The moon”, 2nd Part, 5th
Degree,
pg. 25. (Iyov (Job) 40:9)
Note:
If the Sun is to be classed with “other fixed ... stars”,
and if “the Moon, the Earth and the Sun” are understood to have “annual revolutions”,
this is not describing a geocentric model
of the universe. According to the
cosmological revelation that Abram received by way of Urim v'Tumim, the
Earth is a member of an order of “planets” (mazalot, Abraham 3:9).
The Earth is not perceived to be a planet (wandering star), or orbiting body in a
geocentric model.
See Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan
Language 2nd Part, 3rd Degree,
pp. 29-30 regarding the Sun (Enish-go-ondosh) as a gravitational body and a “fixed star”. Fixed, that is, with respect to other “fixed stars”, yet “central” to the solar system, and moving
(planet like) with respect to a greater cosmic center.
See Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan
Language 2nd Part, 2nd
Degree, “Flos isis”,
pg. 32. It is likely that governing mazalot or
kokhavim extend from
the bicameral center of the galaxy into the outer courts or arms of the galactic temple.
(LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:51-61)
Abraham 3:13
lists “Kokob” after the Elohit (Adamic) name of the sun. The sun is classed as a “greater light”.
“Kokob” is mentioned before the moon,
which is an orbiting “lesser light” (Abraham 3:13), with the understanding that “Kokaubeam
.. signifies ... all the great lights ... in the firmament of heaven” (more than a modern definition of
star here). It was revealed to Abram
that the Kokaubeam “were very great” (Abraham 3:2)
apparently at great distances, and were not mere points of light in the night sky. The sun is then a kokab,
translated “star” and the moon a mazalah translated “planet”.
The earth is a more central body in the earth moon system, but there are
other orbital systems with different barycenters.
As for
how the sun can be both a fixed star and a “planet”; consider that it takes the sun more than two hundred million earth years
to complete one orbit (planet like) around the great galactic center in company with other “fixed stars”(one
Galactic Year, LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:43-44). Joseph Smith’s Kirtland Egyptian Papers
do not support the idea that Abraham’s cosmological revelation is
exclusively framed in an astrological, geocentric model. The Book of Mormon
departs from a geocentric model. (Alma 30:44,
Helaman 12:15)
Moreover, Joseph never said that the great
governing center of our local universe could be seen by unaided human eyes. In fact he (by way of scribes) suggested the opposite.
(Joseph Smith’s Grammar and Alphabet of the Ahmehstrahan
Language, 2nd Part, 5th Degree, “Flos isis”,
pg. 25)
See also TETRAGRAMMATON AND EARTH, and Note ה.
Figure 5
is understood by mainstream Egyptologists to represent the sky goddess Hathor,
who in fact, is affiliated with the sun. Hathor is here
depicted as the maternal, heavenly cow. See Ritner on Figure No. 5. But the
Hebraic minded, may see in the bovine symbol a connection to “eleph”,
a Hebrew word for “cattle” or “kine”. It happens that “eleph” is also the Hebrew word for one “thousand (1000)”. (Tehilim (Ps.) 90:4)
“Eleph”
relates to, and is spelled with the letter “aleph”. In fact, it is spelled the same as “aleph” ( אלף), or “alaph”
- which suggests being yoked together, bound, the learner to the teacher, the lesser and the greater, the
satellite and the central body.
Ah-meh-strah-ans in Ptolemaic times
could have recognized
that aleph is equivalent to the number one in Hebrew Gematria.
Just as Figure 4 (next to Figure 2, Oliblish)
communicates information by way of
Hebraic/Ahmehstrahan Gematria about “the measuring of the time of Oliblish”,
so figure 5 (next to Figure 1, Kolob) can be seen to symbolize that one day with
El is a thousand (eleph)
solar years. There is therefore a sense in which Figure 5 relates to Figure
1, much as Figure 4 relates to Figure 2.
Fig. 6.
Represents this earth in her four quarters . The Ah-meh-strah-an
name for
this earth under the unified governing influence of interplanetary
and interstellar agencies
is similar in pronunciation to the sacred
Tetragrammaton.
See Note א.
The Earth is a member of
an order of “planets” according to Abraham 3:9.
Fig. 7.
Represents
Virile
God [see Note
ד]
sitting upon his throne, revealing through the heavens
the grand Key-words of the
Priesthood; as, also, the sign of
Ruah ha-Qodesh
unto Avram, in the form of a dove (adapted from the symbol of an erect,
virile serpent with legs; consider
B'sorot Matti 10:16).
Note: Modifying Figure 7 so that the
Egyptian virility symbol
discreetly appears to represent an arm, doesn’t necessarily change the intended meaning
(from an Ah-meh-strah-an point of view). The Hebrew word for “arm”,
“z’roa”
(זְרׂעַ),
is akin to the word for “seed”, “zera” (זֶרַע).
Consider Messianic Yesha’Yahu (Is.) 48:14;
52:10;
53:1,
10.
The name of the Egyptian god of virility sounds like the Hebrew word “min”
( מִין)
in connection with “kind” of seed.
Fig. 8.
Contains writings that cannot be revealed unto the world; but is to
be had in the Holy Temple of God.
The
characters read: “may the soul of Osiris Shishaq (Sheshonq) be granted
life”. (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 4-5) The line may be interpreted to signify the birth/resurrection
unto eternal lives of the exalted individual (e.g. Shishaq) as
ha-Adam, analogue to the god Osiris, accompanied by his eternal companion
Havah
(Life), analogue to the throne goddess
Isis; the details of which are presented in the
Holy
Temple. (Bereshit (Gen.) 3:22)
Fig. 9. Ought not to be revealed at the present time;
possibly referring to mysteries (ordinances) pertaining to the “afterworld” (eternity, the cosmos),
“and of his great waters” (possibly including
ha-shamayim
or the heavens, Father's (I9) great (O29) galactic
arm (D36) veiling the heavens, amah or
z'roa - based on Joseph’s supplemented characters. Consider
Facsimile 1, Figure 12.
Consider
LDS Doctrine and Covenants 121:26-32.
Consider also the five points of fellowship with the Star of the
afterworld (N15),
Bemidbar (Num.) 24:17,
Revelation 2:28-29;
22:16 - the living Star of the
house (O1) of
bread (X1),
Bet -
lehem,
Bethlehem, Mikhah (Micah) 5:1-2)
The
characters read: “[God] of the hereafter, and of his great waters”. (Michael
D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp.
4-5)
Fig.
10. Also. Consider
LDS Doctrine and Covenants 133:39-45
The
characters read: “O Mighty God, Lord of heaven and earth”. (Michael D.
Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp.
4-5)
Fig.
11. Also.
The
characters read: “O God of the Sleeping Ones from the time of [the creation]”.
(Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”,
pp. 4-5)
If the
world can find out these numbers [enumerated lines of characters and
gematria ], so let it be.
Amen.
See
Ahmehstrahan
Counting and Gematria
Lines 11,10,9 and 8 read in order: “O God of the Sleeping Ones from
the time of the creation. O Mighty God, Lord of heaven and earth, of the
hereafter, and of his great waters, may the soul of Osiris Shishaq (Sheshonq)
be granted life.” (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus …
Twenty Years Later”, pg. 5)
Figures
12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21, will be given in the own due
time of the
Eternal.
The
characters associated with Figures 21, 20 and 19 read: “You will ever be as
that God, the Busirian [Osiris]”. (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 4-5)
Figure 18, outer edge or rim, reads: “I am the Provider in the
Sun Temple in
Heliopolis. [I am] most exalted and very glorious. [I
am] a virile bull without equal. [I am] the Mighty God in the
Sun Temple in
Heliopolis. <May the Osiris Shishaq [Sheshonq] live
forever> with the Mighty God in Heliopolis.” <Missing text
reconstruction based on British
Museum hypocephali> (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 2, 4-5)
Figures 17, 16 read: “May this tomb never be desecrated, and may this soul
and its lord never be desecrated in the hereafter.” (Michael D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus ... Twenty Years Later”, pp. 2, 4-5)
Figures 12 through 15
are missing hieroglyphs. In the LDS publication of Facsimile 2, the missing
hieroglyphs are filled in with hieratic characters
copied from
the Hor Book of Breathings - a separate funerary work, written in a
different type of Egyptian. The presentation
comes across, at first, as an unwitting mix of legitimate hieroglyphic
text, and commandeered, upside-down, inverted, broken, and redundant Egyptian
shorthand; put in place for the sake of appearance.
It would appear that the Prophet Joseph Smith did not read hieratic or
hieroglyphic Egyptian as current scholars do. Its true that everything he
learned about the Egyptian texts, he learned by way of
inspiration/revelation. But notwithstanding the revelations, by the spring
of 1842, in the midst of American Egyptomania, Times and Seasons
readers were told they would have to
wait for “the own due time of the Lord”
to understand significant portions of the curious Facsimile 2.
The Prophet would not publish made-up meanings for the hieroglyphic text, or
for the inserted hieratic characters with the object of catering to an
inquiring public.
Recently, LDS scholars have tended to suggest that the Prophet was referring
just to the original hieroglyphs of Figures 12 through 15 etc. and their
meanings, as the things to be
“given in the own due time of the Lord”. But its appears more
reasonable, as one examines Joseph’s published Facsimile 2, that he was
referring to both hieroglyphs and the supplemented hieratic characters.
The idea that the Prophet would arbitrarily insert characters in place
of missing hieroglyphs for the sake of appearance, becomes more disturbing the more one thinks about it. If the copied hieratic
characters don’t make sense - maybe they aren’t being interpreting the way
Ah-meh-strah-ans would?
As for the missing hieroglyphs; hasn’t some knowledgeable person guessed
what they might be, based on
a study of other hypocephali?
The answer is
yes! Having examined similar
hieroglyphs on other hypocephali, LDS Egyptologist Val Sederholm, suggests
that the missing hieroglyphs of figures 12 though 15 might read: “j
nTr pfy 'A, 'nx m TAw, jw m mw: 'q r' jw [=r] sDm md.t=f. [Mj n] Wsjr”,
which translates: “I invoke that special, particular, transcendent god, who
lives by breathing, who negotiates the waters: So may
Re [the sun god] descend to hear
Osiris’ words. Come to Osiris Shoshenq.” Sederholm thus interprets
the restored hieroglyphic text (Figures 12 through 15) to be a prayer for
rescue - a prayer befitting the resurrection/deliverance of
Osiris Hor/Abram as depicted in
Facsimile 1.
(Recovering the Missing Hieroglyphs on the Right Panels of LDS Book of Abraham Facsimile 2)
There is no question as to who arranged the hieratic writing,
inserted in place of the
lacunae (missing parts) of the Sheshonq Hypocephalus. The Prophet’s
own diary records:
4 March 1842 - Friday
“Exhibiting the Book of Abraham, in the original [i.e.
facsimiles, cut from more than one scroll, compiled with the English manuscript], To Bro Reuben Hadlock
[Hedlock]. so that he might take the size of the several plates
or cuts. & prepare the blocks for the Times & Seasons. & also
gave
instruction concerning the arrangement of the writing on the Large cut
[hypocephalus
- Facsimile 2]. illustrating the principles of Astronomy...
” (Joseph Smith’s Illinois Journal -
emphasis added)
Joseph Smith’s redacted
hypocephalus accompanied the publication of the
Book of Abraham in the
Times and Seasons newspaper (15 March
1842). The hypocephalus features
hieratic characters copied from the Hor Book of Breathings inserted in place of missing hieroglyphs.
Joseph Smith’s insertions are inverted, or upside-down relative to
adjacent hieroglyphs. This raises several questions: If the sole purpose of
inserting the characters was to give the appearance of completeness, why copy
characters from a separate Egyptian scroll? Why not copy hieroglyphs from
the hypocephalus itself? Could the selection and inversion of the hieratic
characters be deliberate? Indeed the Prophet “gave instruction concerning
the arrangement of the writing”. Is it possible then that the inserted
hieratic writing was not intended to represent continuations of the hieroglyphic
text? Could the hieratic characters be arranged and interpreted so as to
mean something – perhaps relating to Abraham? Like the papyrus and lotus
bouquet symbol added next to Figure 2, could the inserted hieratic
characters be part of the effort to “Abramize” the pagan hypocephalus?
We are suggesting here that the
Prophet was redacting and reinterpreting the hypocephalus Ah-meh-strah-an
style. Many of the hieratic characters inserted in the hypocephalus were
the same characters used to correlate with the
Book of Abraham narrative (1835
manuscripts). These
characters are to be interpreted in Ah-meh-strah-an transtextual ways. In
other words Joseph Smith adapted the funerary facsimiles (including the hypocephalus), and
reinterpreted them in ways that parallel an ancient Ah-meh-strah-an version
of the Book of Abram.
Hieratic characters (lines 1 through 4) from the Hor Book of Breathings,
transposed into hieroglyphic Egyptian. (Hugh Nibley, The Message of the
Joseph Smith Papyri - An Egyptian Endowment, Chapter 2) Note: It is possible that
the Hedlock carving of Facsimile 2 (printing block for the Times and
Seasons newspaper), confuses a set of characters from line 1 of the Hor Book of Breathings,
with a set of similar characters appearing in line 2. In other words,
the apparent redundancy (seen on the upper right-hand rim of the hypocephalus) may not
be.
For a translation of the Hor Book of Breathings, including parts
inserted in the missing portions of the Shishaq Hypocephalus, see Hugh
Nibley’s The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri - An Egyptian
Endowment, Chapter 2.
For Ah-meh-strah-an styled interpretations of many of
these characters, see Esoteric Egyptian in the Margins of the Book of Abraham and
Esoteric Egyptian in Facsimile No. 2.
The
above translation is given as far as we have any right to give at the
present time.
NOTES:
א
Joseph Smith, Grammar and Alphabet of the
Egyptian (Ah-meh-strah-an) Language, 5th Degree
pp. 5 -
6,
Zub Zoal eh, Zab zoal; 4th Degree
pg. 11,
Zub-zaol-eh; 3rd Degree
pg. 14,
Auk eh, Zub-zool-eh; 2nd Degree
pg. 18,
Ahe, Zubzooleh; 1st Degree
pg. 21,
Oan, Zubzool eh; Second part 1st Degree
pg. 33,
Bethku-ain-tri-eth.
Astronomical symbol of the Earth
The original explanation to Fig. 1 presents another
term for the earth. This name is also found in Joseph Smith’s Egyptian
(Ah-meh-strah-an) Alphabet and Grammar. The astronomical symbol of the
earth (in her four quarters) is there associated with an anglicized name
similar to the Tetragrammaton.
The following explanation accompanies the name: “the earth under the government of another …” See Second
part 5th Degree,
pg. 24;
Second part 4th Degree,
pg. 27;
Second part 3rd Degree,
pg 29;
Second part 2nd Degree,
pg. 31;
Second part 1st Degree,
pg. 33.
The symbol that I choose to call the “Ah-meh-strah-an Cross of Adon”, signifying the
rule of the Eternal over the Earth and
her divisions, also signifying the celestial compass and square. The ancient letters of
the sacred
Tetragrammaton appearing in their quarters, are read in endless round. The hieroglyphs represent (1)
the open hand and forearm, (2) a man with upraised arms in the act of
prayerful praise or petition, (3) the nail or tent peg. This symbol can act as “and”
- joining words as if by a nail. The hieroglyphs may be
interpreted to denote, “He who will ever be and who
ever was”.
The “chariot wheel
of tevel
תֵבֵל (the world)” is symbolized with crossed spokes. The letter “tav” as in
“tumeykha” (thy perfections),
and “tevel”
(world), was represented
anciently by the
mark of the cross.
The letter “tet”, as in the Elohim saw their creation to be “tov”
(good),
was similarly represented by the
circle and mark
in X fashion. The Ah-meh-strah-an association of the sacred name
of the Eternal
with the earth may relate to the fact that “yah.t”, an Egyptian word for
“earth”, is somewhat similar to the divine name. See Michael
D. Rhodes, “The Joseph Smith Hypocephalus … Twenty Years Later”, pg. 8.
See also
TETRAGRAMMATON AND EARTH.
ב
Joseph Smith’s,
Grammar and Alphabet of the
Egyptian (Ah-meh-strah-an) Language, 5th Degree
pg. 6 identifies “Egypt” as “Ah-meh-strah”.
Does the word “Ah-meh-strah” relate to the Hebrew “matsor”, suggesting a “limiting boundary,
or border”, a “defense”; as in the mighty Nile “streams of
defense” (Yesha’Yahu (Is.) 19:6)?
Is “Ah-meh-strah” related to “Mitsraymah”, translated
“Egypt” in the
KJV?
Is “Ah-meh-strah” related to “Ahme-as” which means “God without beginning or end”,
according to the Prophet (pg. 33).
Or does “Ah-meh-strah”relate to “amah - sitrah” (אמה־סתרה),
meaning “forearm, mother-city” is “shelter, protection”?
(Devarim (Deut.) 32:37-38,
Abraham 2:16)
The “Ah meh strah ans” are the unique “Egyptians” behind the
esoteric interpretations of funerary facsimiles supplementing a later
version of the Book of Abram.
The Ahmehstrahan society may be viewed as a partial, or preparatory fulfillment of
Yesha’Yahu (Is.) 19:21.
ג
Formerly spelled “Raukeeyang”, Joseph Smith exhibits the
Western Sephardic pronunciation of his Hebrew Instructor Joshua
(James) Seixas. See J. Seixas, Manual Hebrew Grammar, pg.12. The case in which “raqiya”
(firmament or expanse) is pronounced “rau-kee-ng”
(Seixas) dates to Italian and Western Portuguese Jewish communities of
the late 16th century CE. See Aron di Leone Leoni, “The
Pronunciation of Hebrew in the Western Sephardic Settlements (16th
– 20th Centuries). Second Part:
The Pronunciation of the Consonant ‘Ayin”,
SEFARAD, Vol.
68.1, 2008, pp. 163-208.
ד
Hypocephalus of Tasheritkhons (circa 305 to 330 BCE), British Museum, London
Hypocephalus of the Lady Ta-khred-Khonsu (M. Lyon, “Appreciating
Hypocephali as Works of Art and Faith”, FARMS Book of Abraham Lecture
Series, 1999)
Hypocephalus of the Lady Wst-wrt (M. Lyon, “Appreciating Hypocephali as
Works of Art and Faith”, FARMS Book of Abraham Lecture Series, 1999)
ה
Sagittarius A* is not Kolob. It’s in Kolob!
“Kolob
in the second degree. It signfies the wonder of Abraham the
eldest of all the stars, the
greatest body of the heavenly bodies that ever was discovered by man”
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-ans
Language 2nd Part, 2nd Degree, “Kolob”,
pg. 32.)
“Kolob in the first degree, It signifies the first great grand governing
fixed Star which is the fartherest that ever has been discovered by the fathers which was discovered by Methuselar and also by Abraham”
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-ans
Language, 2nd Part, 1st Degree, “Kolob”,
pg. 34.)
The super massive black hole Sagittarius A* does not “govern” by the
“power of attraction”, nor
“regulate” the revolutions and orbits
of all the stars and planets of our local universe – the Milky Way. It isn’t the great securing nail of heaven holding our galaxy together. It is true that Sagittarius A* is at the
center of our galaxy, which galaxy is an enormous
merkabah
or chariot temple. But even though Sagittarius A* is considered “super massive”, it lacks the gravitational mass and field to truly control and influence the structure of the galaxy.
Our galaxy is one of countless heavenly temples in relative motion throughout the universe. The Kolob
Holy of Holies of each heavenly temple is the
galactic bulge. The shining galactic bulge is surrounded by a halo of invisible matter.
The collective gravitational mass of the galactic bulge is orders of magnitude
greater than Sagittarius A*.
Another Kolob, the one at the heart of the Andromeda Galaxy (M31), is the
oldest,
largest,
most distant object that ancient humans could have observed in the nighttime sky with the unaided eye. M31 was likely seen by ancient Hebrews and could have been described as
“kokab ka-leb be-anan”, “a star as the heart in a cloud”.
(Abraham 3:13,
16)
But in order to detect the Kolob of our own galactic home, veiled from our gaze behind nebular curtains
(Isaiah 64:1), extraordinary telescopes capable of detecting
“urim”, “lights” (e.g. infrared, and x-rays) invisible to the human eye must be employed.
(Psalm 139:12)
The governing heart of M31, seen by unaided human eyes, is much more distant
than the unseen bulge of our galaxy.
(Grammar and Alphabet of the Ah-meh-strah-ans
Language, 2nd Part, 1st Degree, “Kolob”,
pg. 34.)
Were the veiled galactic bulge to vanish with its far reaching gravitational field, the arms of the galaxy (in which our tiny earth is nestled, Abraham 3:9) would fly apart into outer darkness. That’s how powerful and important Kolob is.
If all
fifteen of the governing fixed stars had the same mass as Sagittarius A*,
and were located near the galactic center, this would still only represent a
tiny fraction of the gravitational governance of the galactic bulge - Kolob!
Kolob (galactic bulge) has more than one time standard, one of which, “a day unto the Lord”,
corresponds to “one thousand years” on our earth. Though the
annual cycle of Kolob through galactic “seasons” (moedim) “moveth in order more slow” compared to the
orbital velocity of our solar system
around the galaxy, yet the angular velocity of the
great galactic bulge is “swifter”. The
provided Kolob Reality Check calculator, indicates that a galactic bulge
year is on the order of about 100,000,000 earth years. (LDS Doctrine and Covenants 88:44)
There are various possible scenarios within the massive bulge and superposed halo, in which clock slowing effects due to
gravitational potential,
and possibly also
orbital speed,
may result in the passing of only one earth millennium
“in Kolob” for each
outer revolution of the galactic bulge. The earth clock-rate, in this case, is practically
equivalent to that of a
chronometer held at galactic arm’s length
from the dense galactic center. In other words, imagine a clock calibrated to register time in earth years
orbiting in the arm of the galaxy at a
galactic cubit
from the heart of the galaxy. Now imagine that clock placed in orbit at an appropriate place “in Kolob”.
It registers only one earth millennium when Kolob
completes one outer revolution. This is one of several possible interpretations
relating to Abraham 3:4,
Psalm 84:10,
2 Peter 3:8.
Keep in mind that days and years are sometimes prophetically interchangeable in scripture. (Ezekiel 4:5-6,
Revelation 12:6,
JST, Revelation 12:5)
See .
On Tue., Dec. 3, 2024, 2:21 p.m. Vincent Coon, <… >
wrote:
Romolo,
I have added to the commentary about Figure 1 in
[Joseph Smith’s Book of the Dead Hypocephalus] .
Could I please share with you and AI another question, one that I’m not sure that ChatGPT has the wherewithal to answer correctly. Here it is:
If the black hole (Sagittarius A*) at the center of the Milky Way galaxy where to suddenly vanish along with its gravitational field, would there still be enough gravitational mass in the galactic bulge (including dark matter) to hold the galaxy together?
On Tue., Dec. 3, 2024, 7:11 p.m. Romolo Simonetti, <… > wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Great question.
Here's what ChatGPT spits out. I wondered how does it know what you mean by galactic bulge from its response:
[Answer: "galactic bulge" is an accepted scientific description. V. C.]
Yes, the Milky Way Galaxy would remain largely intact if Sagittarius A* (the supermassive black hole at its center) and its gravitational influence were to suddenly vanish. Here’s why:
Mass Contribution of Sagittarius A*
Sagittarius A* has an estimated mass of about
4
million solar masses. While this is immense, it is
relatively small compared to the total mass of the Milky Way, which is
around
1.5
trillion solar masses (including dark matter). The
supermassive black hole contributes less than
0.0003% of the galaxy's total mass.
Gravitational Influence of the Galactic Bulge
The
galactic bulge, which surrounds Sagittarius A*, contains
billions of stars, gas, and dust. This region alone has a mass of around
100
billion solar masses, vastly exceeding that of the black
hole. The gravitational influence of this bulge is the primary force
binding stars in the inner parts of the galaxy.
Role of Dark Matter
The majority of the Milky Way's mass resides in its dark matter halo, which extends far beyond the visible components of the galaxy. Dark matter is responsible for most of the galaxy's gravitational potential, providing the force necessary to hold the stars, gas, and dust in orbit even at great distances from the galactic center.
What Would Happen Without Sagittarius A*?
-
Central Stars and Gas: The orbits of stars and gas
very close to Sagittarius A* (within a few light-years) would be
disrupted. These objects currently orbit the black hole due to its
strong gravitational pull, and without it, they would disperse.
-
Overall Galactic Stability: The rest of the galaxy,
including the spiral arms and stars farther out, would remain
unaffected because their orbits are determined primarily by the mass
distribution in the bulge and the dark matter halo.
In Summary
Sagittarius A* is not structurally critical to the
galaxy as a whole. Its absence would cause changes in the dynamics of
the immediate central region, but the Milky Way would remain bound and
stable due to the overwhelming gravitational influence of the galactic
bulge and dark matter halo.
Kolob Reality Check
Back to
Abraham in Egypt and the Papyrus Solar
Ferry
Back to
Esoteric Egyptian in the Margins of the Book of Abraham
On to
Esoteric Egyptian in Facsimile No. 2
Vincent Coon
וִינְסֶנט
כּוּן
© Copyright 2016
|
|